Skip to content

Conversation

@jbcaillau
Copy link
Member

updated to scalar bounds for default (+/- Inf) constraints for exa in one_pass.jl

@jbcaillau jbcaillau linked an issue Dec 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@jbcaillau jbcaillau self-assigned this Dec 16, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2025

Breakage test results
Date: 2025-12-18 22:59:16

Name Latest Stable
OptimalControl compat: v0.7.2 compat: v0.7.2

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Breakage test results
Date: 2025-12-16 16:40:30

Name Latest Stable
OptimalControl compat: v0.7.2 compat: v0.7.2

@jbcaillau
Copy link
Member Author

  • define and use as_vector for lb and ub, after +/- Inf setting (with * ones! when nothing - error otherwise since different lengths for e1 and e3)

@jbcaillau jbcaillau changed the title changed +/-Inf * ones(...) to just +/- Inf for exa constraints scalarised constraint bounds Dec 18, 2025
@jbcaillau
Copy link
Member Author

close #194

@jbcaillau jbcaillau changed the base branch from main to 181-dev-adding-tensors December 18, 2025 22:58
@jbcaillau jbcaillau merged commit c21717e into 181-dev-adding-tensors Dec 18, 2025
11 checks passed
@jbcaillau jbcaillau deleted the 194-bug-inf-bounds-as-scalars-for-exa branch December 18, 2025 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Inf bounds as scalars for exa

2 participants